Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 March 2021

Death in India from AstraZenica vaccine

 

65 Year Old Man In India Dies Just Minutes After Receiving AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine


Great Game India,

11 March, 2021

A 65-year-old man in India collapsed and passed away just five minutes after getting first dose of vaccine against covid-19. This is the first post-vaccination death in Goregaon. He reached Millat Nursing Home, Jogeshwari at 3.30 pm and got vaccinated at 3.37 pm. He was injected with 0.5 ml dose of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine Covishield intramuscularly.

He collapsed in the chair and passed away within a few minutes. He was a Goregaon resident and he received the first dose of vaccine from Millat Nursing Home, Jogeshwari.  

The authorities said we cannot consider it death due to vaccination till an expert committee reviews it and comes to a conclusion.

BMC said in a statement, “He had several comorbidities, including dilated cardiomyopathy, severe left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension and diabetes mellitus”. 

Executive health officer, Dr Mangala Gomare said, the adverse event following AEF will review the case. “We don’t know if it was a case of anaphylactic shock. The committee will opine after looking at all details”.

As per a civic official, the 65-year-old man was administered injection Adrenaline. This injection is mostly used in cases of adverse reactions following vaccination. The man was shifted to ICU for further investigation. He could not survive and died at 5:05 pm.

His body was sent for autopsy at RN Cooper hospital. He was on multiple heart medications as per civic officials.

As per civic officials, more than 4 people got vaccinated in this city and more than 400 people have faced adverse events following vaccination.  These side effects are minor, but few of them were hospitalized. State officials did not comment over it yet.

Total 40 deaths have been reported across India after getting vaccination against COVID. But as per officials, none of them was caused by the vaccine itself. Death of a health worker after getting a second vaccine dose has been reported in Bhiwadi last week. He was 40-year-old.

Recently, Australia’s Health Minister Greg Hunt in charge of rolling out Australia’s coronavirus vaccine program was hospitalized just one day after taking the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

According to a report by Germany’s Standing Vaccination Commission, the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is only effective 8% in people over 65.

Three European countries of Sweden, France and Germany have decided not to use AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine for people over 65. This decision was made due to the lack of data available about its effectiveness in elderly people.

Tuesday, 9 March 2021

Insurance companies may not pay out if you die from the coronavirus "vaccine"

  

If you die from Coronavirus ‘vaccine’, your life insurance won’t pay as it’s an ‘experimental medical intervention’

https://tapnewswire.com/2021/03/if-you-die-from-vaccine-your-life-insurance-wont-pay-as-its-an-experimental-vaccine/

7 March, 2021


Check with your insurer before you have the vaccine.  It’s reported that some or all life insurance won’t pay out for COVID vaccine related deaths, as the ‘vaccine’ is experimental.   If this is too big a risk for your insurers, should you be taking it?

Even having had a COVID test could mean you are no longer eligible for insurance.  You need to do some careful research, contact your insurers, before getting vaccinated or tested.

https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/covid-19/your-health/covid-19-your-life-insurance

You could read between the lines of the following from ABI –

Can I still buy life insurance?

Many insurers are still accepting life insurance applications and some have now included a coronavirus related question (see below for expected questions). Some insurers are delaying applications if you are currently testing positive for coronavirus and need to provide medical evidence, but this does not mean you cannot apply again in the future.

What questions should I expect to be asked on coronavirus when applying for life insurance?

Life insurance companies have developed specific questions to assess the risk around coronavirus for new applications. This is simply to make sure that they have the full picture when they assess your health and medical circumstances.

Coronavirus questions may include:

  • Have you tested positive for coronavirus?
  • Are you currently in self-isolation?
  • Have you had any symptoms of coronavirus?
  • Have you been in direct contact with anyone who has been diagnosed or suspected of having a coronavirus?

If you answer yes to some of these questions, your decision may be delayed until you have recovered. The decisions may vary between insurer.

If you’re classed as being high-risk because of your medical condition such as people with severe Diabetes, Asthma, Heart Conditions, Auto-immune Diseases, and a number of other conditions, then you won’t be classed as ‘self-isolating’ unless you’ve got symptoms. People who are being advised to stay at home to keep themselves safe will just be classed as a standard low-risk individual.

Obviously having the vaccine is a separate issue which they don’t mention, but individuals who ask insurers will they pay out on death caused by the vaccine are being told NO as it is not a vaccine, but an experimental medical intervention.  Be advised.

Documentary: The Truth Behind The Vaccine Trials


The Truth Behind The Vaccine Trials - Documentary Film 2021



So the vaccine is not technically licensed as the clinical trials will not be completed until 2023, yet the vaccine promotion campaign is rampant everywhere.

The government, corporations, and celebrities are on an orchestrated campaign to sell us the vaccine, but on what basis are they promoting it?

In this film we will look at how Covid-19 vaccine managed to make it into peoples veins in such a record time, how trials work, and should we just take the vaccine manufactures word of its safety and efficacy.

Featuring as guests: Robert F Kennedy & Prof Dolores Cahill

If you get severe Covid vaccine side effects, there's likely no one to sue


We know all this but the most surprising thing about this article is that it was written at all.

 You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either

CBS,

20 December, 2021


Under the PREP Act, companies like Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.

  • A little-known government program provides benefits to people who can prove they suffered serious injury from a vaccine.

  • That program rarely pays, covering just 29 claims over the last decade.

If you experience severe side effects after getting a Covid vaccine, lawyers tell CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law. 

The federal government has granted companies like Pfizer and Moderna immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.



“It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“

You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment.

Congress created a fund specifically to help cover lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses for people who have been irreparably harmed by a “covered countermeasure,” such as a vaccine. But it is difficult to use and rarely pays. Attorneys say it has compensated less than 6% of the claims filed in the last decade.

Immune to lawsuits

In February, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there’s “willful misconduct” by the companyThe protection lasts until 2024.

That means that for the next four years, these companies “cannot be sued for money damages in court” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid

HHS declined CNBC’s request for an interview.

Dunn thinks a big reason for the unprecedented protection has to do with the expedited timeline. 

“When the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” said Dunn.

The quickest vaccine ever developed was for mumps. It took four years and was licensed in 1967. Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine was developed and cleared for emergency use in eight months — a fact that has fueled public mistrust of the coronavirus inoculation in the U.S.

Roughly 4 in 10 Americans say they would “definitely” or “probably” not get vaccinated, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. While this is lower than it was two months ago, it still points to a huge trust gap.

But drugmakers like Pfizer continue to reassure the public no shortcuts were taken. “This is a vaccine that was developed without cutting corners,” CEO Dr. Albert Bourla said in an interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Monday. “This is a vaccine that is getting approved by all authorities in the world. That should say something.”

The legal immunity granted to pharmaceutical companies doesn’t just guard them against lawsuits. Dunn said it helps lower the cost of the immunizations.

“The government doesn’t want people suing the companies making the Covid vaccine. Because then, the manufacturers would probably charge the government a higher price per person per dose,” Dunn explained. 

Pfizer and Moderna did not return CNBC’s request for comment on their legal protections.

Is anyone liable?

Remember, vaccine manufacturers aren’t the ones approving their product for mass distribution. That is the job of the FDA.

Which begs the question, can you sue the U.S. government if you have an extraordinarily bad reaction to a vaccine?

Again, the answer is no. 

“You can’t sue the FDA for approving or disapproving a drug,” said Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law. “That’s part of its sovereign immunity.”

Sovereign immunity came from the king, explains Dunn, referring to British law before the American Revolution. “You couldn’t sue the king. So, America has sovereign immunity, and even each state has sovereign immunity.”

There are limited exceptions, but Dunn said he doesn’t think they provide a viable legal path to hold the federal government responsible for a Covid vaccine injury.

Bringing workers back to the office in a post-Covid world also carries with it a heightened fear of liability for employers. Lawyers across the country say their corporate clients are reaching out to them to ask whether they can require employees to get immunized.

Dunn’s clients who run businesses serving customers in person or on site are most interested in mandating a Covid vaccine for staff.

“They view it as a selling point,” Dunn said. “It’s particularly important for restaurants, bars, gyms and salons. My clients in that segment of the service industry are looking hard at making it mandatory, as a sales point to their customers.” 

While this is in part a public relations tactic, it is legally within an employer’s rights to impose such a requirement. 

“Requiring a vaccine is a health and safety work rule, and employers can do that,” said Reiss.

There are a few notable exceptions. If a work force is unionized, the collective bargaining agreement may require negotiating with the union before mandating a vaccine.

Anti-discrimination laws provide some protections as well. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, workers who don’t want to be vaccinated for medical reasons are eligible to request an exemption. If taking the vaccine is a violation of a “sincerely held” religious belief, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 would potentially provide a way to opt out.

Should none of these exemptions apply, employees may have some legal recourse if they suffer debilitating side effects following a work-mandated Covid inoculation.

Attorneys say claims would most likely be routed through worker’s compensation programs and treated as an on-the-job injury. 

“But there are significant limits or caps on the damages an employee can recover,” said Dunn. He added that it would likely be difficult to prove.

Mandatory vaccination protocols, however, may not happen until the FDA formally approves the vaccines and grants Pfizer and BioNTech or Moderna a license to sell them, which will take several more months of data to show their safety and effectiveness.

“An emergency use authorization is not a license,” said Reiss. “There’s a legal question as to whether you can mandate an emergency observation. The language in the act is somewhat unclear on that.”

$50,000 a year

The government has created a way for people to recover some damages should something go wrong following immunization.

In addition to the legal immunity, the PREP Act established the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which provides benefits to eligible individuals who suffer serious injury from one of the protected companies.

The little-known government program has been around for a decade, and it is managed by an agency under HHS. This fund typically only deals with vaccines you probably would never get, like the H1N1 and anthrax vaccines

If a case for compensation through the CICP is successful, the program provides up to $50,000 per year in unreimbursed lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses. It won’t cover legal fees or anything to compensate for pain and suffering. 

It is also capped at the death benefit of $370,376, which is the most a surviving family member receives in the event that a Covid vaccine proves to be fatal.

But experts specializing in vaccine law say it is difficult to navigate. “This government compensation program is very hard to use,” said Reiss. “The bar for compensation is very high.”

Also worrisome to some vaccine injury lawyers is the fact that the CICP has rejected a majority of the compensation requests made since the program began 10 years ago. Of the 499 claims filedthe CICP has compensated only 29 claims, totaling more than $6 million. 

David Carney, vice president of the Vaccine Bar Association, said the CICP might deny a claim for a variety of reasons. “One reason might be that the medical records don’t support a claim,” said Carney, who regularly deals with vaccine injury cases. “We have to litigate a lot of really complex issues ... and provide a medical basis for why the injury occurred.”

Proving an injury was a direct result of the Covid vaccine could be difficult, according to Carney. “It’s not as simple as saying. ‘Hey, I got a Covid treatment, and now I have an injury.’ There is a lot of burden of proof there.”

There is also a strict one-year statute, meaning that all claims have to be filed within 12 months of receiving the vaccine.

“People who are harmed by a Covid vaccine deserve to be compensated fast and generously,” said Reiss. “The PREP Act doesn’t do that.”

Lawyers tell CNBC that it would make more sense for Covid vaccine injuries to instead be routed through another program under the HHS called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which handles claims for 16 routine vaccines. Known colloquially as “vaccine court,” the program paid on about 70% of petitions adjudicated by the court from 2006 to 2018.

And since it began considering claims in 1988, the VICP has paid approximately $4.4 billion in total compensation. That dwarfs the CICP’s roughly $6 million in paid benefits over the life of the program.

The VICP also gives you more time to file your claim. You have three years from the date of the first symptom to file for compensation.

“The VICP allows for recovery of pain and suffering, attorney’s fees, along with medical expenses and lost wages, if any,” said Michael Maxwell, a lawyer who practices in the areas of business litigation and personal injury. “Under the CICP, it’s only lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses. That’s it, unless there’s a death.”

The Covid-19 vaccines, however, aren’t on the list of eligible vaccines.

Reiss said the best fix would be to change VICP’s rulebook to add Covid vaccines to its list of covered inoculations. “That will require legislative change. I hope that legislative change happens.”

Dr. Cahill on whether the covid-19 vaccine is a real vaccine or a genetic experiment


Dr. Fuellmich interviewed Dr. 

Cahill, a biologist

/immunologist, and 

questioned whether the 

covid-19 vaccine is a real 

vaccine or a genetic 

experiment 


For months, a team of lawyers has been preparing class actions for those responsible for the covid-19 pandemic. This is a crime against humanity lawsuit similar to the Nuremberg trial. At this meeting, Dr. Fuellmich interviewed Dr. Cahill, a biologist/immunologist, and questioned whether the covid-19 vaccine is a real vaccine or a genetic experiment. She said this is a dangerous gene therapy that will trigger your own immune system to attack the body's own organs and eventually kill the person.


Pfizer wants military bases in developing countries as “guarantee” for vaccines


This excellent bit of journalism from Indian television lays bare the sort of pressure countries are being put under the accept the mRNA Pfizer vaccine.

See below for an article that has been published in mostly countries from the global south.


WHEN CORPORATIONS RULE THE WORLD

Gravitas: Pfizer's abusive vaccine deals

Pfizer wants military bases as “guarantee” for vaccines


Pfizer has become a terror. The US pharma company is reportedly asking for military bases and sovereign assets as guarantee for vaccines. WION's Palki 

Sharma has the details.



This article has appeared in several outlets, but not in mainstream news sources.



A medical worker fills a syringe with a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Tokyo Medical Centre, February 17, 2021. Photo: Behrouz Mehri/Pool via Reuters/File Photo.

the Wire Science,

24 February, 2021

However, the government officials from Argentina and the unnamed country who spoke to the Bureau felt Pfizer’s demands went beyond those of other vaccine companies, and beyond those of Covax, an organisation created to ensure low-income countries can access vaccines, which is also requiring its members to indemnify manufacturers. This presents an additional burden for some countries because it means having to hire specialist lawyers and sometimes pass complex new legislation, so manufacturers’ liabilities can be waived – Write Madlen Davies, Rosa Furneaux, Iván Ruiz, and Jill Langlois

Pfizer has been accused of “bullying” Latin American governments in COVID-19 vaccine negotiations and has asked some countries to put up sovereign assets, such as embassy buildings and military bases, as a guarantee against the cost of any future legal cases, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism can reveal.

In the case of one country, demands made by the pharmaceutical giant led to a three-month delay in a vaccine deal being agreed. For Argentina and Brazil, no national deals were agreed at all. Any hold-up in countries receiving vaccines means more people contracting COVID-19 and potentially dying.

Officials from Argentina and the other Latin American country, which cannot be named as it has signed a confidentiality agreement with Pfizer, said the company’s negotiators demanded additional indemnity against any civil claims citizens might file if they experienced adverse effects after being inoculated. In Argentina and Brazil, Pfizer asked for sovereign assets to be put up as collateral for any future legal costs.

One official who was present in the unnamed country’s negotiations described Pfizer’s demands as “high-level bullying” and said the government felt like it was being “held to ransom” in order to access life-saving vaccines.

Campaigners are already warning of a “vaccine apartheid” in which rich Western countries may be inoculated years before poorer regions. Now, legal experts have raised concerns that Pfizer’s demands amount to an abuse of power.

“Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be using their power to limit life-saving vaccines in low- and middle-income countries,” said Professor Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organisation’s Collaborating Centre on National and Global Health Law. “[This] seems to be exactly what they’re doing.”

Protection against liability shouldn’t be used as “the sword of Damocles hanging over the heads of desperate countries with a desperate population,” he added.

Pfizer has been in talks with more than 100 countries and supranational organisations, and has supply agreements with nine countries in Latin America and the Caribbean: Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay. The terms of those deals are unknown.

Pfizer told the Bureau: “Globally, we have also allocated doses to low- and lower-middle-income countries at a not-for-profit price, including an advance purchase agreement with Covax to provide up to 40 million doses in 2021. We are committed to supporting efforts aimed at providing developing countries with the same access to vaccines as the rest of the world.” It declined to comment on ongoing private negotiations.

Most governments are offering indemnity – exemption from legal liability – to the vaccine manufacturers they are buying from. This means that a citizen who suffers an adverse effect after being vaccinated can file a claim against the manufacturer and, if successful, the government would pay the compensation. In some countries people can also apply for compensation through specific structures without going to court.

This is fairly typical for vaccines administered in a pandemic. In many cases adverse effects are so rare that they do not show up in clinical trials and only become apparent once hundreds of thousands of people have received the vaccine (a 2009 H1N1 flu vaccine, for example, was eventually linked to narcolepsy). Because manufacturers have developed vaccines quickly and because they protect everyone in society, governments often agree to cover the cost of compensation.

However, the government officials from Argentina and the unnamed country who spoke to the Bureau felt Pfizer’s demands went beyond those of other vaccine companies, and beyond those of Covax, an organisation created to ensure low-income countries can access vaccines, which is also requiring its members to indemnify manufacturers. This presents an additional burden for some countries because it means having to hire specialist lawyers and sometimes pass complex new legislation, so manufacturers’ liabilities can be waived.


India is large enough to resist entities like Pfizer that they have had difficulties with in the past



Pfizer Inc has withdrawn an application for emergency-use authorisation of its COVID-19 vaccine in India that it has developed with Germany’s BioNTech, the company told the Reuters news agency on Friday.

The United States company, which was the first drugmaker to apply for emergency use authorisation of its COVID-19 vaccine in India, had a meeting with the country’s drugs regulator on Wednesday and the decision was made after that, the company said.

“Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time,” it said in a statement to Reuters.

“Pfizer will continue to engage with the authority and re-submit its approval request with additional information as it becomes available in the near future.”


Meanwhile, at almost exactly the same time New Zealand announced that they had accepted the vaccine and were putting the release on fast track.

I suspect New Zealand's method of negotiation is to agree to any and every suggestion that is put to them by corporations that are bigger than them.

I remember Noam Chomsky talking about the neoliberal reforms in New Zealand: the only difference with the rest of the world was that it did it VOLUNTARILY, and ahead of most of the rest of the world.  Chile was the first.



New Zealand has given the green light to its first Covid-19 vaccine, with Medsafe announcing provisional approving for a jab from Pfizer and BioNTech that has become a cornerstone of the global immunisation effort.

The first shipments of the vaccine, which will now face no legal hurdles at the border, are expected in the country before the end of March. New Zealand has 1.5 million doses on order for the jab, which has shown 95% effectiveness in trials.

First in line for vaccination will be border workers, a group which includes all the staff in managed isolation facilities, their families, as well as airline staff. This relatively small group is expected to be fully vaccinated within two to three weeks.


Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Prof. Dolores Cahill in conversation

 Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Prof. Dolores Cahill Feb 21, 2021 - World Update



In this 60 minute interview Prof Dolores Cahill you will learn:

-about the formation of the World Freedom Alliance and Freedom Airways;
-why she bought a castle in Ireland;
-the long term plan for the global population put in place by Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Goals;
-how she has is educating the police on their unlawful police activity;
-why she calls the COVID19 injections (they’re not a vaccine);
-why the Nuremberg Trials need to be repeated and updated;
….and so much more!

What are you going to do RIGHT NOW? How can you push back? Professor Cahill has a very specific CALL TO ACTION that everyone can do and will really make a difference for all of humanity. You don’t want to miss this inspirational conversation and positive action to take now.

For the continuation of this interview and others, where we take a Deep Dive into their lives and work, join my podcast membership on The Tenpenny Files Premium Members at https://bit.ly/Tfiles

1,170 DEAD Following COVID Injections


 CDC Witholding Information: 1,170 DEAD Following COVID Injections – Almost Twice As Many Deaths As Found In VAERS

by Brian Shilhavy

Humans are free,

13 February, 2021

Yesterday we reported that the CDC had done another data dump into the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database, showing that through February 4, 2021, there were 12,697 recorded adverse events, including 653 deaths following injections of the experimental COVID mRNA shots by Pfizer and Moderna.

Cdc Witholding Information 1,170 Dead Following Covid Injections – Almost Twice As Many Deaths As Found In Vaers

After publishing this article, a Health Impact News subscriber sent me a link to a page on the CDC website where they are reporting that as of February 11, 2021, VAERS received 1,170 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.

The page, at least at the time of publication today, is located here.

We have captured a screen shot of this page, and made some editorial edits.

Cdc 2.11 Report Covid

Click on image for full size. Edited by Health Impact News with editorial edits, protected by free speech and freedom of the press in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Original page here.

For the past few weeks, the CDC has been slowly updating the VAERS database with data dumps on Friday, just before the weekend and the beginning of the slow news cycle that usually picks up again on Mondays.

On Friday, January 29th, their VAERS data reported 329 deaths from people receiving one of the experimental COVID mRNA injections.

The following Friday, February 5, 2021, their VAERS data reported 501 deaths. An increase of 172 deaths.

Yesterday, February 12, 2021, the CDC VAERS data reported 653 deaths. An increase of 152 deaths.

That still leaves 517 deaths unaccounted for in the VAERS database related to the COVID injections.

Why Is The CDC Withholding This Information?

ZERO Deaths Linked to COVID “Vaccinations”?

One of the most incredible statements made by the CDC on this page regarding the COVID injections is that they found no link from over 1100 reported deaths to the Pfizer and Moderna experimental mRNA shots.

CDC and FDA physicians review each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports. A review of available clinical information including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records findings revealed no link with vaccination. CDC and FDA will continue to investigate reports of adverse events, including deaths, reported to VAERS.

How could anyone believe this unscientific statement? How could anyone continue to believe that the CDC is actually concerned about public health, and not simply a marketing department for Big Pharma?

Here is what the FDA states in their guidelines for both the Pfizer and Moderna experimental COVID mRNA injections:

Serious adverse events are defined as:

• Death;
• A life-threatening adverse event;
• Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
• A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
• A congenital anomaly/birth defect;
• An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (Source)

How could anyone believe that out of 41 million doses of experimental COVID mRNA injections administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through February 7, 2021, with over 1100 deaths reported to VAERS (the actual number of deaths is much higher since they are not all reported in VAERS), that NONE of them are related to these experimental injections that have not even completed Phase 3 trials and are not even approved by the FDA yet?

Read some of the reports we have published over the past few weeks (see below), especially of young and middle-aged healthcare professionals with no previous health conditions who die very shortly after being injected, and ask yourself: How could the CDC conclusively determine that the shot did not cause this?

Remember, the CDC does not even have a category for death by vaccine to list on death certificates, so according to them, nobody has ever died as a result of a vaccine, even though the U.S. Government has paid out BILLIONS in compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths since 1986 and the advent of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

(Quarterly reports from the DOJ found here).

CDC’s History Of Corruption And Conflict Of Interest

I have published this information frequently during the past couple of months, but it bears repeating here since apparently so few in the public are aware of the depth of corruption at the CDC.

The CDC is the largest purchaser and distributor of vaccines in the world, allocating over $5 BILLION in their budget (supplied by American taxpayers) each year to purchase and distribute vaccines from Big Pharma.

Do you think this might be a conflict of interest?

Secondly, the CDC owns over 56 patents on vaccines, and many of their scientists earn royalties from the sale of vaccines. (Source)

Do you think this might be a conflict of interest?

The CDC has a long history of corruption, and over the years many of their own scientists have tried to blow the whistle on this corruption only to be silenced.

n addition, many of the directors running the CDC go on to work for Big Pharma after they complete their term at the CDC.

If you are putting your faith in the CDC to protect your health, you are trusting in a false god, and you will suffer the consequences.

See now that I myself am He! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand. (Deuteronomy 32:39)

CDC: 653 Deaths & 12,697 Reported Injuries Following Experimental MRNA COVID Injections